Longevity of resin composite restorations
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Factors associated with the longevity of resin composite restorations.
This study investigated factors associated with the longevity of resin composite restorations, which were placed in 97 patients (mean age of 58 years) by 24 dentists in Nagasaki University Hospital between 1995 and 2005. All patients were under the charge of the principal investigator (SK) and most of them had been regularly checked up for up to 11 years. A total of 503 resin composite restorat...
متن کاملMicroleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
Background and Aim: One of the weaknesses of Class II composite resin restorations is gingival microleakage which contributes to postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries. The aim was to evaluate the microleakage in Class II composite resin restorations with different thicknesses of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, standardized Class II s...
متن کاملReestablishment of occlusion with prosthesis and composite resin restorations.
Here, we present a case report on prosthetic reconstruction of posterior teeth and composite resin restoration of anterior teeth yielding considerable esthetic improvement, reestablishment of disocclusion guides and function.
متن کاملComposite resin support of undermined enamel in amalgam restorations.
PURPOSE Previous reports suggested that cusp fracture strength increases with the use of bonded composites. The purpose of this study was to assess fracture resistance of undermined cusps, when supported by a layer of bonded composite, in extensive occlusal carious lesions. METHODS Primary and permanent molars in children that were treated included those with extensive occlusal caries with un...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Japanese Dental Science Review
سال: 2011
ISSN: 1882-7616
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2010.05.002